Friday, June 20, 2014

                                                                    Redskins

(*This was originally posted by me on facebook, under my facebook name, earlier today. Apparently, it resonated with some friends because it has already been reposted a few times that I know of. I'm placing it here, as well, as record that I was the author of this piece. I suspect that I will want to revise and edit this later, when some of my passion has died down.*)

OK. I just f***ing lost it in one of these "redskin debates" with ignorant white people. Ended up typing all this (below), and I'm still shaking with rage. Yes, I know that not everyone "cares," but this is for those that do: 

"What a bunch of arrogant, privileged crybabies people are, complaining about the idea of the Redskins possibly changing their name. Is it really that big ofan imposition on you to give up the use of terms that deeply offend so many First Americans? Does it really interfere with your football watching pleasure so much that it's worth it to continue to use a racial slur as a team name and a stereotyped image of other human beings as a mascot? Have your values and rights been that seriously violated because people are finally starting to realize that it's not considered polite or good business to refer to other human beings as redskins, niggers, kykes, bitches, or any other term that represents deep disrespect and a history of violent conflict?

And then I hear people (usually “white” people,who only call themselves “white” because at some point in time, it became useful for them or their ancestors to renounce their own customs and cultural identity in order to “pass” as having “no color” in a racist society) ask stupid question like: “Where will it end?”

I don't know where it will end. Maybe we will get rid of other team names that use Native Americans or even people from other groups as “comical,”stereotyped mascots. Maybe places like “Squaw Peak” (former name of a mountain in Arizona) will be renamed Piestewa Peak to show real respect for a Native American veteran who honorably served her country. Maybe people will consider the terms they use before speaking to one another, so that children won't have to grow up wondering why their cultural identity is a joke among “white” people or why mainstream society thinks it's OK to nonchalantly use and profit from a reference to acts of genocide. (“Redskin” is a reference to the practice of hunting Native Americans like animals and scalping them for a bounty). Is that such a bad place to end up? Is showing a bit of respect to members of historically oppressed groups such a horrible outcome that we must throw up our hands and despair over where this all will end?

Where will it end? Maybe you should ask a Native American where it will end. Natives have been asking the same question for about 500 years now. Did it end when Columbus captured and sold Native Americans into slavery in Europe or had his crew cut off the hands of Natives who wouldn't/ couldn't bring him gold or when the Spanish raped native women? Did it end with “westward expansion,” which is really a euphenism for the systematic genocide of Native Americans and the theft of Native lands and resources? Did it end with the boarding school system, in which children were stolen from their families, punished for speaking their own language, often forced to cut their hair and remove other signs of cultural affiliation? Too bad they couldn't remove those “red skins,” since having a “red skin” meant that, until civil rights, Native Americans couldn't even vote in the very land founded by their ancestors.

Yes, they were here first, just in case no one remembers. They beat the Europeans by thousands of years. Not only that, but Native American cultures directly influenced the development of American democracy, a fact that is reflected in some of our national symbols and icons. But no one remembers that. Instead, they remember some goofy, cartoonish depiction of a “redskin” on a football helmet.

I guess they should all grow thicker skins, since, after all, the Fighting Irish don't care. But the Irish don't have to care, since they take out their ethnic background and put it away at their convenience. On St. Patrick's Day or during football games, those with some Irish ancestry get to take out their little green flags and wave them. On all other days, they get to pass as “white.” That's not a luxury one has when wearing a “red” skin. And it's kind of hard to grow that skin thicker, when it's still under attack.

(By the way, having some small amount of “Indian blood” (whether documented or not) does not qualify you to say that racism has ended and that people need to “just get over it.” If you pass as “white,” you have no idea what it's like to wear the “red” skin.)

Where will it end? Who knows? Maybe it will end with an end to the third world conditions that real Americans endure on our reservations today. Perhaps it will end discrimination against my Native friends when they leave the reservations in search of better economic opportunities, only to be called bad names and quietly denied opportunities that “white people” take for granted. (And if you don't believe discrimination still happens, it's because you've been lucky. Odds are, you have been lucky enough to not have “red” skin that causes people to think of you as lower class, ignorant, alcoholic, a welfare leech, or worse.) Maybe it will end when the suspicious disappearance of a Native American woman is taken as seriously as the disappearance of a “white” woman. Maybe it will end when a hit and run of a Native American is treated as manslaughter or murder, instead of just the random death of another “drunken Indian.”

I guess none of this is really important in comparison to the all-important need say whatever one wants, regardless of whom is hurt.

Where will it end? I have no idea where it will end. But having an end to ridiculous, shallow, ignorant arguments from spoiled, self-important bigots would be a nice start. Yeah, I just used my freedom of speech (another concept that has some roots in Native American cultures) to call people out for being the jack@$$es that they are. But unlike Native Americans, who have to live within the skin that is associated with horrible names, you can change the person that is associated with the names I have used here. At least I hope so."

Sunday, February 9, 2014

How History Will Judge Us: My Black History Month Thoughts

I don't believe that slavery ever ended in the United States. It simply changed form. The system used to threaten the brown and the poor with malnutrition and poor quarters, capture, imprisonment and death for noncompliance.

It now threatens the brown and the poor with:
  • malnutrition (via cutting people off from their food supplies and then rationing “food stamps” as the elites see fit) and poor quarters (sometimes outright homelessness)
  • capture and imprisonment (via the police state and prison industry), and
  • death (via both external forces like executions, infant mortality from poor nutrition and medical care, high use of the poor and minorities in the military, as well not providing funds and appropriate training/ mentoring for programs to help with effective programs to address self destructive forces like substance abuse and gang violence).
I truly feel that someday, if the human species survives (and that is a BIG “IF”), the humans of the future shall judge us at least as harshly as we judge the entire slave culture of the south. People will shake their heads and wonder things like:

Why did people do that?

How can members of the same species treat one another so poorly?

Did people seriously believe that it was correct and rational to deliberately starve out a significant portion of the population as a means of furthering progress?

Did the government seriously lock millions of people in cages for the majority of their lives over petty infractions that most people didn't even regard as dangerous? And that problem wasn't widely questioned or challenged? Why not?

Were human beings honestly afraid to walk around in their own neighborhoods, where most of the scary elements of the jungles we evolved within had been removed ? Was the phenomenon of humans preying upon other humans that prevalent?

Why were people choosing to hide within the perceived safety of their boxes—driving very short distances in their oversized cars with locking doors and tinted windows, building additional walls around yards in order to protect the walls within and the people within the the walls? And why, after pulling curtains to the windows closed to their houses in their semi-segregated neighborhoods, did they keep trying to peep at the lives of others through their TV's and computers?

Did people seriously fear other people who didn't share roughly the same skin color and hair types?

Why did they all care so much about their weapons?

What kind of crazy, paranoid, aggressive people were they, living in perpetual fear of one another?

What the f--- were people thinking?

How did their leaders convince them that this was an acceptable, and even desirable, way to live?

I also feel that these (minus the F-bomb question) will be the text book questions written about our present society. And if I were lucky enough to live in a future time when humans had finally learned to get along (at get along least well enough to not savagely destroy one anothers' lives, either through direct violence or through a slow and deliberate campaign to wear out, demoralize, and suck the spirit out of one another), I would wish that I could write some of that textbook. And my my next questions would be these:

How did humans change? How did they get past this? What makes us better humans being now than we were several hundred years go?

And I would hope that my answer is not the same one that I have today.